Infographic: 64 tech hubs plotted by tech job opportunity vs. visa difficulty for skilled tech workers

More tech workers are open to moving abroad for work than a few years ago. But “where is the job market good?” and “where can I actually get a visa?” are two different questions. I put both on one chart for 64 tech hubs.

Why this matters

A few data points I checked:

  • In the 2025 CERC/Ipsos Global Mobility Survey of 10,574 workers across 19 countries, “almost half (49%) of employees say they would consider relocating internationally for work; a notable increase compared to 2017, when 46% would consider the same” (Ipsos). The sponsor report frames this as relocation “for up to two years” and lists information technology (58%) as the second most open sector, behind utilities (59%) (CERC/WFPMA sponsor report).
  • The most famous tech visa is also a lottery. For the US H-1B cap in fiscal year 2026, USCIS counted about 339,000 eligible unique beneficiaries and selected 118,660 of them in the initial selection. (USCIS)
  • Rules keep moving. In 2026 alone, Germany raised its EU Blue Card salary thresholds (Make it in Germany), Sweden moved to a 90%-of-median salary requirement (Migrationsverket), Malaysia roughly doubled its Employment Pass salary minimums (ESD Malaysia), and Singapore announced higher Employment Pass salaries from 2027 (MOM). In the US, the $100,000 H-1B payment introduced in 2025 was blocked by the courts in 2026 while the government appeals (USCIS).

So I wanted a single view: where are the jobs, and where is the door actually open?

The findings

The sweet spot (many jobs, easier visa): Amsterdam, Paris, Tokyo, Seoul. All four combine strong tech ecosystems with a clear, employer-sponsored route.

  • Amsterdam: the Netherlands’ highly skilled migrant permit, through an IND-recognised employer.
  • Paris: France’s “Talent” residence card.
  • Tokyo: Japan’s engineer visa and its points-based highly skilled professional track.
  • Seoul: Korea’s E-7 professional visa.

None of them uses a lottery.

Close behind: Singapore, Tel Aviv, Dublin, Hong Kong.

  • Singapore and Tel Aviv score higher on jobs than any city in the top group, but their visas are a bit harder. Singapore has a salary bar plus a points test. Israel has a high minimum salary for foreign experts.
  • Dublin and Hong Kong are among the easiest visas on the chart for a solid job market. Ireland has its Critical Skills permit. Hong Kong’s Top Talent Pass doesn’t even require a job offer.
  • Berlin, Toronto-Waterloo and Bengaluru sit just behind.

The US: the most jobs, the hardest visa. Silicon Valley, New York, Boston and Seattle top the jobs axis. They also sit at the bottom of the visa axis. The H-1B is capped and allocated by lottery, now weighted by wage level. On top of that, policy has been unstable: a $100,000 fee was announced, then blocked by courts, and a separate fee has been proposed.

Other patterns:

  • London has a deep job market. But the UK Skilled Worker route needs a licensed sponsor and a £41,700 minimum salary, which puts it just outside the sweet spot.
  • Zurich and China’s hubs (Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Hangzhou) are hard. Switzerland has a fixed annual quota for non-EU workers. China uses a points-based permit system with rising salary thresholds.
  • Many smaller hubs are easy to enter but have fewer jobs. Examples are Tallinn, Vilnius, Helsinki, Dubai, Kuala Lumpur and Auckland. They’re worth a look if you already have an offer or work remotely.

Methodology

Tech jobs score (1-10). This is based mainly on the Startup Genome Global Startup Ecosystem Report 2025 ranking. I adjusted it with my judgment of each hub’s size and pay level. Hubs outside that ranking were scored on general market size only.

Visa difficulty score (1-10). Each hub starts at 1 and adds points:

  • +3 for a capped lottery (US H-1B)
  • +2 for a hard national quota, or +1 for a soft or very large quota or an overall cap on temporary workers
  • +1 if employer sponsorship is required
  • +1 for a labour-market test or local-hire/understudy requirement
  • +1 for a salary or points threshold that is high relative to local tech pay
  • +1 if typical processing takes over 3 months (+2 if over 6 months or tied to an annual cycle)
  • +1 each for: a language barrier in most tech jobs, recent tightening, policy instability or high fees or security concerns, heavy bureaucracy

Scores max out at 10. In practice they range from 2 to 8. The chart’s quadrant line sits at 4.5 on visa difficulty and 5.5 on jobs.

Verification. On 13 October 2026, I checked the main skilled-worker route in each of the 43 countries behind the 64 hubs against official immigration pages.

  • 37 countries: I opened and read official pages, fully for 28 and partially for 9.
  • Vietnam: checked against the full text of the relevant decree on a legal database.
  • 5 countries: the official sites could not be fetched (blocked, bot checks or dead links). These are India, Israel, Australia, Finland and Colombia, and their scores rely on secondary sources.

A few inputs are also flagged as secondary-only. Examples include Korea’s E-7 salary floor, Japan’s processing times and Poland’s Blue Card salary. The full per-country data (exact URLs read and inputs that remain unverified) is available on request: DM me or email explore@juliensalinas.com.

Assumptions:

  • The person is a skilled tech worker from outside the EU, with a job offer.
  • Nationality matters a lot. EU citizens move freely within the EU, and bilateral deals exist, so your personal result may differ.
  • Points were nudged slightly apart on the chart when scores tie.

Caveats

  • These are editorial scores, not measurements. The rubric makes my judgment explicit and consistent, but it is still judgment.
  • Rules change fast. Several changed during 2026, and the US fee situation could flip again after appeal. Check the official page before you act.
  • A visa route existing doesn’t mean you’ll get it. Approval depends on your profile, your employer and the specific role.
  • The jobs score leans on startup ecosystems. It under-weights places with large corporate or outsourcing tech employment.
  • Cost of living, salaries after tax, language and quality of life aren’t on this chart. They matter as much as the two axes.

If you spot an error or a rule that changed, tell me and I’ll update the chart.


Julien Salinas · @juliensalinas · explore@juliensalinas.com

API Rate Limiting With Traefik, Docker, Go, and Caching

Limiting API usage based on advanced rate limiting rule is not so easy. In order to achieve this behind the NLP Cloud API, we're using a combination of Docker, Traefik (as a reverse proxy) and local caching within a Go script. When done correctly, you can considerably improve the performance of your rate limiting and properly throttle API requests without sacrificing speed of the requests. Continue reading